Topic : ขอเพิ่มปริมาณการนำเข้า
จากคุณ  :  อัญชลี   [ 10/6/2009 10:13:33 AM]
จะขอเพิ่มปริมาณ การนำเข้าวัตถุอันตรายประเภทที่ 3
เดิมขอไว้ ปริมาณ 1.00 เมตริกตัน/ต่อปี
จะต้องทำอย่างไรบ้างค่ะ ?


จากคุณ : กระทู้เก่าๆมี    [10/6/2009 10:26:58 AM]


จากคุณ : อัญ    [10/6/2009 11:57:50 AM]

ลองหาแล้วค่ะ แต่ไม่พบคำตอบ ที่ชัดเจน
ยังไงรบกวน อีกครั้งนะค่ะ


จากคุณ : ช่วยตอบนะ    [10/12/2009 10:09:08 AM]


จากคุณ : ppst    [25/10/2560 13:10:55]

on the wits, and withal just as good riding, just as careful horsemastership, and just as much self-sacrifice, audacity, and dash. I shall prove this up to the hilt by direct illustration from modern wars; but is it not self-evident? For here are men vested with the offensive and defensive power of Infantry, together with a mobility which is several times that of Infantry. Infantry have plenty to do to become good at their trade. How imperious and exacting must be the demands upon mounted infantry! I have slipped into one of the conventional definitions. Let us give it capitals, and ask how the fire-duties of Cavalry differ essentially from those of Mounted Infantry, or any other category of mounted riflemen?

Fog hangs heavy on that most pertinent inquiry. But the answer, of course, is that there is no difference whatever. And it follows necessarily that, however seldom or often fire-duties may be required of Cavalry, Cavalry will be excelled by mounted riflemen in the performance of those duties, just as they will be excelled in shock by troops who have more practice in shock. In either sphere the hybrid type must succumb to the pure type, and the moral is all the easier to see and enforce because the pure type of mounted rifleman, however arbitrary and fanciful the limits assigned to its utility, is actually and officially recognized at this moment, whereas no such thing as a pure type of shock horseman exists.

Nor is it only a case of competition with other mounted riflemen or other hybrid Cavalry. Let the reader extract from “Cavalry Training,” tabulate, and analyze all the 44fire-duties now theoretically allotted to Cavalry. It will take some little trouble, because they are not marshalled compactly or given the emphasis they deserve. He will find that they cover almost the entire range of war, and it goes without saying that in every one of these duties the trooper must be prepared to fight approximately as well as the riflemen opposed to him, whether they be Infantry or mounted men. Otherwise he will fail. Troops cannot be manipulated in war so that each class meets only its corresponding type. Each class must be prepared to meet any other, both in defence and offence. I am not constructing an academical dilemma, but a dilemma forced upon us by the facts of modern war. Bernhardi sees it clearly, and goes much farther, accordingly, than “Cavalry Training” dares go, in postulating that utterly unattainable perfection in both weapons which is the only way out of the dilemma. More on that point later.

 ความคิดเห็นเพิ่มเติม : Reply  this Topic

จากคุณ : name

รายละเอียด : article